Blog
Investment & Finance

Why Most Retail Portfolios Underperform

By
alphaAI
Updated
June 21, 2025
5 minute read
Published
June 21, 2025
5 minute read
Share this post

Table of Contents

When individual investors purchase a mutual fund or ETF, it stands to reason that their returns should, over time, mirror the asset’s performance. However, studies consistently show otherwise. For example, Morningstar reports that mutual funds typically return approximately 7.3% per year, while investors realize closer to 6.3%, resulting in a persistent under-performance rate of about one percentage point annually. This phenomenon is termed the “behavior gap”—the difference between theoretical returns and those actually realized by investors.

Moreover, in 2024, Dalbar’s Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior revealed that the average equity fund investor lagged the S&P 500 by an extraordinary 8.48 percentage points. The index returned around 25%, whereas the average investor realized just 16.5%, largely due to poor timing, premature withdrawals, and chasing past performance.

Over extended periods, these discrepancies compound significantly. Through 2021, equity fund investors earned an annualized return of 7.13%, compared to the S&P 500’s 10.65%—a persistent gap of approximately 3.5 percentage points that substantially reduces long-term growth.

Understanding the Behavior Gap

Research identifies several behavioral patterns that explain this gap. First, investors often exhibit “return-chasing” behavior, allocating more capital to funds after strong performance and withdrawing during downturns. Morningstar found a correlation coefficient of 0.49 between mutual fund flows and prior returns, indicating significant momentum chasing.

Second, panic selling during market declines exacerbates losses. Funds typically experience outflows just before rallies begin, intensifying underperformance. Third, empirical research shows that active traders were outperformed by buy‑and‑hold investors by as much as six percentage points annually, largely due to transaction costs, poor timing, and taxation.

Behavioral biases such as loss aversion, anchoring, narrow framing, herd mentality, and regret further distort judgment and reinforce the performance gap.

The Consequences of Irrational Investing

The cumulative effect of these behaviors is severe. Short-term capital gains generate higher taxes, frequent trading incurs elevated fees and slippage, and mistimed decisions often result in missing critical market rebounds. Studies indicate that being out of the market during just a handful of the best-performing days can erode a portfolio’s value by more than half over a two-decade period.

A Better Approach: Systematic Investing

Investing systematically—whether through periodic contributions, set rebalancing rules, or algorithmic strategies—helps eliminate discretionary errors. Passive approaches, such as index investing, consistently outperform active trading over time, as evidenced by SPIVA and Morningstar data, which show that around 80% of active funds underperform their benchmarks annually.

Automation also helps mitigate emotional mistakes. Vanguard has documented that employing target-date or model portfolios reduces behavioral drag and preserves investor returns—an outcome worth hundreds of billions of dollars over a decade.

Subscribe to stay up to date on the latest at alphaAI!

By clicking Sign Up you're confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What It Means for You

The primary driver of underperformance is not asset allocation or market inefficiency; it is investor behavior. Reducing or eliminating discretionary trading can markedly improve outcomes. Implementing a disciplined investing process—such as automated rebalancing, dollar-cost averaging, or rules-based strategies—can bridge the behavior gap.

For those interested in a data-driven, rule-based approach, alphaAI’s AI-enabled portfolios adapt to market conditions without discretionary decision-making. By building emotion-free execution into strategy, alphaAI seeks to preserve discipline and enhance long-term performance.

If you'd like to explore how alphaAI works in practice, consider starting with an account under $1,000, risk-free for a trial period.

References

  1. https://assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blt4eb669caa7dc65b2/blt0571178b63219c0b/2024_Mind_the_Gap.pdf
  2. https://www.dalbar.com/Portals/dalbar/Cache/News/PressReleases/QAIB2024_PR.pdf 
  3. https://www.dalbar.com/Portals/dalbar/Cache/News/PressReleases/2025QAIBPressRelease.pdf
  4. https://darnallsikeswealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DSWP-The-Behavioral-Effect-on-Investor-Returns-2024-F.pdf
  5. https://ritholtz.com/2023/08/mind-the-gap/
  6. https://www.hartfordfunds.com/dam/en/docs/pub/prospectingmaterials/SEM_MR.pdf

Supercharge your trading strategy with alphaAI.

Discover the power of AI-driven trading algorithms and take your investments to the next level.

Latest

Explore Our Blog

Stay updated with our latest blog posts.

Machine Learning & AI

AI vs. Emotions: Who Wins at Investing?

Many investors underperform not because they pick the wrong assets, but because they panic at the wrong moments—selling during dips or chasing rallies.
alphaAI
5 min read
June 21, 2025
Investment & Finance

The Truth About Leveraged ETFs: Power Tool or Portfolio Enabler?

Leveraged ETFs can serve as powerful tools—but only when wielded with precision. Left unchecked, volatility drag and severe drawdowns will erode performance.
alphaAI
5 min read
June 21, 2025
Investment & Finance

Why Most Retail Portfolios Underperform

The primary driver of underperformance is not asset allocation or market inefficiency; it is investor behavior. Reducing or eliminating discretionary trading can markedly improve outcomes.
alphaAI
5 min read
June 21, 2025